The Oregon Legislature Approves Cannabis Exports, Will the U.S. Follow Suit?
Various localities’ ability to become “laboratories of democracy” (to an extent) and implement their own laws is a rather unique and interesting concept not employed by all nations. In the United States, states moving forward with their own cannabis laws have been a driving force to change public opinion and create momentum for federal policy changes that wouldn’t have occurred otherwise. The Obama administration wouldn’t have implemented a policy allowing state-regulated cannabis without federal interference unless enough states moved forward with their own laws first. The Trump administration has largely followed Obama’s lead on the issue, and more federal reforms are on the horizon after more states have passed progressive laws. Now that Oregon is poised to become the first state to allow cannabis exports (after Governor Kate Brown’s signature and federal acquiescence) how quickly will the United States follow suit?
As Johnny Green writes in Leafly, Oregon has set in motion the potential for federal change, either through federal law or a simple policy pronouncement:
Just as the Obama administration issued the Cole memo in order to provide some protections for in-state cannabis commerce, so too could the Trump administration issue a directive to allow—or at least not prosecute—interstate cannabis commerce. That’s a far more streamlined process than getting a bill through Congress, though it’s still far from inevitable. Trump himself has taken an inconsistent approach to cannabis reform while in office.
Passage of Oregon’s export bill means the state’s cannabis industry can now start lobbying the Trump administration in addition to lobbying Congress. Since many states could ultimately benefit from interstate cannabis commerce, it’s expected the cannabis industry in general would join in the effort.
***
Cannabis exports may not begin with the governor’s signature, but the bill’s becoming law would still be a very significant event. The measure builds momentum for federal interstate reform at the federal level and builds momentum in other states. The first victory is always the hardest in politics, and Oregon has now taken care of that.
The bipartisan STATES Act, which would officially leave it up to the states to craft their own cannabis laws (as they do with alcohol) has garnered a lot of momentum, but it is difficult to imagine Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell allowing the bill to have a vote, as he’s declared himself the “Grim Reaper” killing progressive bills. However, McConnell could lose his leadership post if the Democrats take the Senate, or he could lessen is hardline stance after the elections if the GOP remains in control, or the Trump or next presidential administration could simply issue a new federal directive to kick-start interstate cannabis commerce. With the rapid ascent of the cannabis movement in the U.S., exporting to other nations could certainly occur in the near future, shaking up the international industry.
To learn the latest, prepare for what’s next, and network with top investors and entrepreneurs, you want to be at the International Cannabis Business Conference. Up next: Vancouver, Canada, this September 15-16. Purchase your discounted, early bird tickets by August 21st to save.
john ward
Wait a minute, This interstate transport has been around for years. are we going to need to fill out a form now? This will cause a severe security issue. If we give all of our information we will become targets of the gangs and even worse the police. You just can’t trust the cops with our flowers.
Jubone Noyb
I’m curious….am I missing something here? Someone weigh in on this: The stores that sell marijuana must keep their funds in a safe and they can’t use banks because they are regulated by the feds, and if banks handle marijuana money they can be charged with money laundering. But the states that tax the stores, where in the hell they keep THAT $$$ in a HUGE freakin’ vault? Think about it…the stores that sell marijuana have to pay state taxes and when they pay the taxes they MUST pay in CASH…they cant simply write a CHECK. When the state uses the tax $$$$ for (as they claim) programs, schools, etc. do they just go grab the cash out of the vault and hand it out? NO, THEY ISSUE A STATE GOV. CHECK, but from where, the sky? SOMEWHERE along the ‘chain of custody’ the federal banking industry is rubbing that money in some way or another. Below is an example pic of a State issued check: notice the BANK OF AMERICA PRINT on it? So the lingering question is how can ANY State use any one of those same banks to put the TAX money in (which is from the PROFITS of selling cannabis) but John J Smith can’t run down the street to deposit his/her earnings from that day/week into ANY one of those SAME banks themselves without repercussions, AND why can’t the banks themselves accept the same cash (that the State accepted) without them being threatened by the Feds that they could be subject to sanctions such as their FDIC protection taken away or the threat (of which has been reported by SEVERAL news reports) of being charged with MONEY LAUNDERING.. As Congressman Mike Quigley recently stated: “Now that IL has legalized recreational #marijuana, it’s time for Congress to pass the #SAFEBankingAct to ensure that cannabis businesses have the same access to banking as any other legitimate business”…….and I’ll add: that they ALSO have the same access to the very same banking that the States do to put the Tax $$$ in. ;P
PLEASE SHARE TO FORCE THE GOV. TO GET MARIJUANA OUT OF SCHED 1 STATUTE https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3e862976e4da25f61493fefb2df108abab5fc854836cadc3dc22880b52fabd48.jpg